Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Appellant's goods "Siapton 10L and Isabion" correctly classifiable as fertilizer under CETA 3101 00 99, not as Plant Growth Regulator under CETA 3808 93 40 as claimed by Department. Larger Bench of CESTAT held plant growth promoters cannot be equated with plant growth regulators which inhibit, promote or alter physiological processes. Impugned orders set aside. Appeals allowed.
Appellant's goods "Siapton 10L and Isabion" correctly classifiable as fertilizer under CETA 3101 00 99, not as Plant Growth Regulator under CETA 3808 93 40 as claimed by Department. Larger Bench of CESTAT held plant growth promoters cannot be equated with plant growth regulators which inhibit, promote or alter physiological processes. Impugned orders set aside. Appeals allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.