AMP expenditure for own business is not an international transaction without an associated-enterprise arrangement, eliminating transfer pricing adjust...
Customs valuation must use comparable contemporary imports, while confiscation fines and penalties require proportionate recalculation on reassessed v...
Depositor-protection proceedings prevail over corporate insolvency, while liquidators may recover chit receivables using copies of seized company reco...
Intermediary service classification fails where overseas admission facilitation is supplied independently, preserving export treatment and small-provi...
Satellite transponder bandwidth is telecommunication, not Business Support Service; foreign non-telegraph providers triggered no service tax liability...
The CESTAT held that for refunds filed under the Central Excise Act, 1944, interest on delayed refunds is governed by Section 11BB and would be payable from the date of deposit made by the assessee, as per the Supreme Court's decision in Ranbaxy case. The appeal filed by the assessee against the adjudicating authority's order, which had calculated interest from the deposit date, was dismissed.
The CESTAT held that for refunds filed under the Central Excise Act, 1944, interest on delayed refunds is governed by Section 11BB and would be payable from the date of deposit made by the assessee, as per the Supreme Court's decision in Ranbaxy case. The appeal filed by the assessee against the adjudicating authority's order, which had calculated interest from the deposit date, was dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
