Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
The CESTAT held that for refunds filed under the Central Excise Act, 1944, interest on delayed refunds is governed by Section 11BB and would be payable from the date of deposit made by the assessee, as per the Supreme Court's decision in Ranbaxy case. The appeal filed by the assessee against the adjudicating authority's order, which had calculated interest from the deposit date, was dismissed.
The CESTAT held that for refunds filed under the Central Excise Act, 1944, interest on delayed refunds is governed by Section 11BB and would be payable from the date of deposit made by the assessee, as per the Supreme Court's decision in Ranbaxy case. The appeal filed by the assessee against the adjudicating authority's order, which had calculated interest from the deposit date, was dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
