Rectification of mistake remains limited to self-evident record errors, preventing merits review through miscellaneous applications and preserving fin...
Tender creditworthiness conditions may extend to de facto Promoter Directors, with post-participation challenges generally barred absent arbitrariness...
Corporate representation in PMLA summons proceedings permitted through an authorised signatory, subject to directors' continuing cooperation and atten...
Helicopter charter classification requires effective control analysis, while territorial performance, reasoned credit orders and wilful suppression de...
Specified fund definition expands PAN exemption eligibility for registered alternative investment funds and qualifying International Financial Service...
Tax exemption for specified legal-services authority income applies retrospectively, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and...
The HC dismissed the petitions filed by the petitioners challenging the constitutional validity of Sections 13 of SARFAESI Act, 19 of RDB Act, 7, 9, 10, 95 of IBC, and seeking benefits under MSMED Act. The HC imposed a cost of Rs.1 lakh on petitioners for filing repeated petitions with identical prayers before different HCs, despite disclosing such facts, attracting the principle of estoppel. The cost is to be deposited with Registrar General within a month for transmission to HC Legal Services Committee.
The HC dismissed the petitions filed by the petitioners challenging the constitutional validity of Sections 13 of SARFAESI Act, 19 of RDB Act, 7, 9, 10, 95 of IBC, and seeking benefits under MSMED Act. The HC imposed a cost of Rs.1 lakh on petitioners for filing repeated petitions with identical prayers before different HCs, despite disclosing such facts, attracting the principle of estoppel. The cost is to be deposited with Registrar General within a month for transmission to HC Legal Services Committee.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.