Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
The HC dismissed the petitions filed by the petitioners challenging the constitutional validity of Sections 13 of SARFAESI Act, 19 of RDB Act, 7, 9, 10, 95 of IBC, and seeking benefits under MSMED Act. The HC imposed a cost of Rs.1 lakh on petitioners for filing repeated petitions with identical prayers before different HCs, despite disclosing such facts, attracting the principle of estoppel. The cost is to be deposited with Registrar General within a month for transmission to HC Legal Services Committee.
The HC dismissed the petitions filed by the petitioners challenging the constitutional validity of Sections 13 of SARFAESI Act, 19 of RDB Act, 7, 9, 10, 95 of IBC, and seeking benefits under MSMED Act. The HC imposed a cost of Rs.1 lakh on petitioners for filing repeated petitions with identical prayers before different HCs, despite disclosing such facts, attracting the principle of estoppel. The cost is to be deposited with Registrar General within a month for transmission to HC Legal Services Committee.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4807
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
