Specified income tax exemption for pollution control body remains conditional on non-commercial activity, unchanged income character, and return filin...
Jurisdictional facts in certificate-of-origin discrepancies can support customs show-cause proceedings, leaving factual explanations for departmental ...
Market value for captive electricity consumption follows industrial consumer tariffs, supporting profit computation for the power generation deduction...
In the absence of incriminating material found during the search u/s 153A, no addition can be made for the assessment year 2012-13, except supported by incriminating documents. This view finds support from the Supreme Court's judgment in PCIT vs. Abhisar Buildwell P. Ltd., wherein it was held that no addition can be made for completed assessments without incriminating material. Further, the Rajasthan High Court's decision in PCIT vs. M/s. Esspal International P. Ltd. stated that merely based on a retracted statement, no addition can be sustained. Consequently, the addition was directed to be deleted, deciding in favor of the assessee.
In the absence of incriminating material found during the search u/s 153A, no addition can be made for the assessment year 2012-13, except supported by incriminating documents. This view finds support from the Supreme Court's judgment in PCIT vs. Abhisar Buildwell P. Ltd., wherein it was held that no addition can be made for completed assessments without incriminating material. Further, the Rajasthan High Court's decision in PCIT vs. M/s. Esspal International P. Ltd. stated that merely based on a retracted statement, no addition can be sustained. Consequently, the addition was directed to be deleted, deciding in favor of the assessee.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.