Admissibility of electronic evidence bars undervaluation demands where printouts, retracted statements and no cross-examination leave the case unprove...
Limitation in oppression and mismanagement proceedings: prior knowledge of removal and dilution barred the challenge, with valuation directions upheld...
Insolvency professional agency governance rules amended to add nominee directors, tighten independent director eligibility, and regulate managing dire...
In the absence of incriminating material found during the search u/s 153A, no addition can be made for the assessment year 2012-13, except supported by incriminating documents. This view finds support from the Supreme Court's judgment in PCIT vs. Abhisar Buildwell P. Ltd., wherein it was held that no addition can be made for completed assessments without incriminating material. Further, the Rajasthan High Court's decision in PCIT vs. M/s. Esspal International P. Ltd. stated that merely based on a retracted statement, no addition can be sustained. Consequently, the addition was directed to be deleted, deciding in favor of the assessee.
In the absence of incriminating material found during the search u/s 153A, no addition can be made for the assessment year 2012-13, except supported by incriminating documents. This view finds support from the Supreme Court's judgment in PCIT vs. Abhisar Buildwell P. Ltd., wherein it was held that no addition can be made for completed assessments without incriminating material. Further, the Rajasthan High Court's decision in PCIT vs. M/s. Esspal International P. Ltd. stated that merely based on a retracted statement, no addition can be sustained. Consequently, the addition was directed to be deleted, deciding in favor of the assessee.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4819 
Join Channel 
