Inherited property sale proceeds require capital-gains treatment where ownership is supported by evidence, not suspicion or unverified signature doubt...
Cross-examination of retracted statements is essential where foundational evidence supports a benami allegation and documented funding explanations re...
Capital-goods exemption covers plant-modernisation accessories, while the import restriction applies only to earlier capital-goods components and spar...
Constitutional judicial review permits challenges to ECIRs and connected money-laundering proceedings where coercive action affects fundamental intere...
In the absence of incriminating material found during the search u/s 153A, no addition can be made for the assessment year 2012-13, except supported by incriminating documents. This view finds support from the Supreme Court's judgment in PCIT vs. Abhisar Buildwell P. Ltd., wherein it was held that no addition can be made for completed assessments without incriminating material. Further, the Rajasthan High Court's decision in PCIT vs. M/s. Esspal International P. Ltd. stated that merely based on a retracted statement, no addition can be sustained. Consequently, the addition was directed to be deleted, deciding in favor of the assessee.
In the absence of incriminating material found during the search u/s 153A, no addition can be made for the assessment year 2012-13, except supported by incriminating documents. This view finds support from the Supreme Court's judgment in PCIT vs. Abhisar Buildwell P. Ltd., wherein it was held that no addition can be made for completed assessments without incriminating material. Further, the Rajasthan High Court's decision in PCIT vs. M/s. Esspal International P. Ltd. stated that merely based on a retracted statement, no addition can be sustained. Consequently, the addition was directed to be deleted, deciding in favor of the assessee.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4794
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
