Inherited property sale proceeds require capital-gains treatment where ownership is supported by evidence, not suspicion or unverified signature doubt...
Cross-examination of retracted statements is essential where foundational evidence supports a benami allegation and documented funding explanations re...
Capital-goods exemption covers plant-modernisation accessories, while the import restriction applies only to earlier capital-goods components and spar...
Constitutional judicial review permits challenges to ECIRs and connected money-laundering proceedings where coercive action affects fundamental intere...
The HC stayed the impugned order invoking Section 73 of the CGST Act, 2017 for recovery of short paid tax due to discrepancy between GSTR-1 and GSTR-3B, holding that Section 73 allows recovery of tax not paid or short paid due to reasons other than fraud or willful misstatement, and the conclusions referring to Section 9 of CGST Act show liability created with reference to IGST and cess leviable.
The HC stayed the impugned order invoking Section 73 of the CGST Act, 2017 for recovery of short paid tax due to discrepancy between GSTR-1 and GSTR-3B, holding that Section 73 allows recovery of tax not paid or short paid due to reasons other than fraud or willful misstatement, and the conclusions referring to Section 9 of CGST Act show liability created with reference to IGST and cess leviable.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4798
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
