Development agreements require legal possession or effective enjoyment for capital gains transfer; permissive possession and deferred consideration de...
Prolonged sterilisation of development rights supports capital-gains treatment, while business-income disallowances cannot govern capital-gains comput...
Additional evidence in transfer pricing dispute leads to fresh examination, while tax deductions, TDS credit, fee and refund interest require verifica...
Category II AIF pass-through taxation preserves non-business income character; investment receipts cannot be reclassified without applying recognised ...
The Delhi HC in PCIT vs. Inderjit Singh Sodhi HUF held that interest, whether on compensation or enhanced compensation received on acquisition of land u/ss 28 or 34 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, shall be taxable as 'Income from Other Sources' u/s 56(2)(viii), distinguishing the SC's decision in CIT vs. Ghanshyam HUF and concurring with the P&H HC's ruling in Mahender Pal Narang vs. CBDT on the amended provisions of Section 56(2).
The Delhi HC in PCIT vs. Inderjit Singh Sodhi HUF held that interest, whether on compensation or enhanced compensation received on acquisition of land u/ss 28 or 34 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, shall be taxable as 'Income from Other Sources' u/s 56(2)(viii), distinguishing the SC's decision in CIT vs. Ghanshyam HUF and concurring with the P&H HC's ruling in Mahender Pal Narang vs. CBDT on the amended provisions of Section 56(2).
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
