Minimum alternate tax exclusions for pre-amendment banking companies and expatriate Indian branch salaries remain outside head office expenditure limi...
Page of 4805
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
1201 to 1220 of 96100 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The Delhi HC in PCIT vs. Inderjit Singh Sodhi HUF held that interest, whether on compensation or enhanced compensation received on acquisition of land u/ss 28 or 34 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, shall be taxable as 'Income from Other Sources' u/s 56(2)(viii), distinguishing the SC's decision in CIT vs. Ghanshyam HUF and concurring with the P&H HC's ruling in Mahender Pal Narang vs. CBDT on the amended provisions of Section 56(2).
The Delhi HC in PCIT vs. Inderjit Singh Sodhi HUF held that interest, whether on compensation or enhanced compensation received on acquisition of land u/ss 28 or 34 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, shall be taxable as 'Income from Other Sources' u/s 56(2)(viii), distinguishing the SC's decision in CIT vs. Ghanshyam HUF and concurring with the P&H HC's ruling in Mahender Pal Narang vs. CBDT on the amended provisions of Section 56(2).
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
