Purposive interpretation of residential house exemption: unregistered purchase agreement alone does not defeat relief, but investment must be verified...
Page of 4817
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
3041 to 3060 of 96333 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The Delhi HC in PCIT vs. Inderjit Singh Sodhi HUF held that interest, whether on compensation or enhanced compensation received on acquisition of land u/ss 28 or 34 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, shall be taxable as 'Income from Other Sources' u/s 56(2)(viii), distinguishing the SC's decision in CIT vs. Ghanshyam HUF and concurring with the P&H HC's ruling in Mahender Pal Narang vs. CBDT on the amended provisions of Section 56(2).
The Delhi HC in PCIT vs. Inderjit Singh Sodhi HUF held that interest, whether on compensation or enhanced compensation received on acquisition of land u/ss 28 or 34 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, shall be taxable as 'Income from Other Sources' u/s 56(2)(viii), distinguishing the SC's decision in CIT vs. Ghanshyam HUF and concurring with the P&H HC's ruling in Mahender Pal Narang vs. CBDT on the amended provisions of Section 56(2).
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4817 
Join Channel 
