Patent-settlement expenditure treated as commercially expedient revenue outlay, with foreign-law restrictions inapplicable before the prospective amen...
International transaction benchmarking restricts transfer pricing adjustments to associated-enterprise dealings, while functional comparability govern...
Joint development agreements defer taxable transfer where possession lacks part performance, while completed flats determine consideration and exempti...
The CESTAT upheld the respondents' case, ruling that the allegations of fraudulently obtaining Duty Free Credit Entitlement (DFCE) licenses and engaging in circular trading of cut and polished diamonds were unfounded. The Tribunal affirmed that the DFCE licenses used for imports were valid, as the DGFT had not cancelled or modified them. Consequently, the demands for duty, confiscation of goods, and penalties were dismissed, and the Revenue's appeal was rejected.
The CESTAT upheld the respondents' case, ruling that the allegations of fraudulently obtaining Duty Free Credit Entitlement (DFCE) licenses and engaging in circular trading of cut and polished diamonds were unfounded. The Tribunal affirmed that the DFCE licenses used for imports were valid, as the DGFT had not cancelled or modified them. Consequently, the demands for duty, confiscation of goods, and penalties were dismissed, and the Revenue's appeal was rejected.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4803
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
