Opportunity to respond to jurisdictional reports is mandatory before customs settlement duty enhancement; connected applications require consistent ad...
Specific customs headings for scaffolding components prevail over general classification, invalidating misclassification proceedings and enabling with...
Liquidator appointment under Section 34 requires consideration of creditor recommendations, valid professional authorisation, and preservation of vali...
Income-tax exemption for specified regulatory fees and government grants applies subject to non-commercial activity and continuing compliance conditio...
Digital accessibility audit and remediation deadlines extended, while all other disability-compliance obligations for regulated entities remain unchan...
Page of 4803
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
621 to 640 of 96047 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The Kerala HC held that the denial of amendment of 4 shipping bills from Advance Authorisation Scheme to Duty Drawback Scheme solely on the ground of time bar of 3 months from LEO date as per Circular 36/2010-Cus is untenable. Section 149 of the Customs Act, 1962 allows prescribing time limit by regulations. The Shipping Bill (Post Export Conversion) Regulations, 2022 provide 2 years for conversion. Rejecting conversion on time bar is unsustainable. The appeal by the assessee is allowed.
The Kerala HC held that the denial of amendment of 4 shipping bills from Advance Authorisation Scheme to Duty Drawback Scheme solely on the ground of time bar of 3 months from LEO date as per Circular 36/2010-Cus is untenable. Section 149 of the Customs Act, 1962 allows prescribing time limit by regulations. The Shipping Bill (Post Export Conversion) Regulations, 2022 provide 2 years for conversion. Rejecting conversion on time bar is unsustainable. The appeal by the assessee is allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.