Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Page of 4801
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
341 to 360 of 96001 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The Kerala HC held that the denial of amendment of 4 shipping bills from Advance Authorisation Scheme to Duty Drawback Scheme solely on the ground of time bar of 3 months from LEO date as per Circular 36/2010-Cus is untenable. Section 149 of the Customs Act, 1962 allows prescribing time limit by regulations. The Shipping Bill (Post Export Conversion) Regulations, 2022 provide 2 years for conversion. Rejecting conversion on time bar is unsustainable. The appeal by the assessee is allowed.
The Kerala HC held that the denial of amendment of 4 shipping bills from Advance Authorisation Scheme to Duty Drawback Scheme solely on the ground of time bar of 3 months from LEO date as per Circular 36/2010-Cus is untenable. Section 149 of the Customs Act, 1962 allows prescribing time limit by regulations. The Shipping Bill (Post Export Conversion) Regulations, 2022 provide 2 years for conversion. Rejecting conversion on time bar is unsustainable. The appeal by the assessee is allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.