Transaction value cannot be rejected solely on non-statutory valuation guidelines without corroborative evidence supporting reassessment of final cust...
Cross-examination rights and corroborated evidence limit customs penalties for misdeclaration in genuine import transactions involving documented clea...
Tariff classification of vehicle gear components follows the specific gearing entry, displacing motor-vehicle parts classification and related liabili...
Necessary-party requirements limit impleadment of independent entities, while deferred consideration does not create an appealable adverse determinati...
Food supplement classification requires common parlance and authoritative tests, preventing treatment as proprietary Ayurvedic medicines without suppo...
The CESTAT held that the one-year period for filing a refund claim u/r 5 of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004, for exports made on a quarterly basis, commences from the end of the quarter in which the foreign exchange is received. Since the appellant filed the refund claim on 28.03.2018, within one year from the end of the quarter January-March 2017, the rejection of the refund of Rs. 93,39,310/- was not tenable. Consequently, the appeal was allowed.
The CESTAT held that the one-year period for filing a refund claim u/r 5 of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004, for exports made on a quarterly basis, commences from the end of the quarter in which the foreign exchange is received. Since the appellant filed the refund claim on 28.03.2018, within one year from the end of the quarter January-March 2017, the rejection of the refund of Rs. 93,39,310/- was not tenable. Consequently, the appeal was allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
