Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Risk-based postal import clearance standardises electronic assessment, document requests, duty realisation and delivery controls at Foreign Post Offic...
Customs Cargo Service Provider appointment extends custodianship to additional terminal land, subject to cargo-control, security and licence condition...
The CESTAT held that the one-year period for filing a refund claim u/r 5 of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004, for exports made on a quarterly basis, commences from the end of the quarter in which the foreign exchange is received. Since the appellant filed the refund claim on 28.03.2018, within one year from the end of the quarter January-March 2017, the rejection of the refund of Rs. 93,39,310/- was not tenable. Consequently, the appeal was allowed.
The CESTAT held that the one-year period for filing a refund claim u/r 5 of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004, for exports made on a quarterly basis, commences from the end of the quarter in which the foreign exchange is received. Since the appellant filed the refund claim on 28.03.2018, within one year from the end of the quarter January-March 2017, the rejection of the refund of Rs. 93,39,310/- was not tenable. Consequently, the appeal was allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
