Liquidator appointment under Section 34 requires consideration of creditor recommendations, valid professional authorisation, and preservation of vali...
Income-tax exemption for specified regulatory fees and government grants applies subject to non-commercial activity and continuing compliance conditio...
Digital accessibility audit and remediation deadlines extended, while all other disability-compliance obligations for regulated entities remain unchan...
The AT dismissed the appeal. The appellant company was found to be a sham entity established to launder proceeds of crime by an accused, Mr. Anurag Gupta. The ED complied with procedural requirements u/ss 5, 17 and 20 of PMLA for retaining seized properties prima facie involved in money laundering. The offence being independent, the appellant could be proceeded against despite not being named in the scheduled offence FIR/chargesheet, as it possessed unexplained proceeds of crime.
The AT dismissed the appeal. The appellant company was found to be a sham entity established to launder proceeds of crime by an accused, Mr. Anurag Gupta. The ED complied with procedural requirements u/ss 5, 17 and 20 of PMLA for retaining seized properties prima facie involved in money laundering. The offence being independent, the appellant could be proceeded against despite not being named in the scheduled offence FIR/chargesheet, as it possessed unexplained proceeds of crime.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4801
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
