Development agreements require legal possession or effective enjoyment for capital gains transfer; permissive possession and deferred consideration de...
Prolonged sterilisation of development rights supports capital-gains treatment, while business-income disallowances cannot govern capital-gains comput...
Additional evidence in transfer pricing dispute leads to fresh examination, while tax deductions, TDS credit, fee and refund interest require verifica...
Category II AIF pass-through taxation preserves non-business income character; investment receipts cannot be reclassified without applying recognised ...
Mutual fund maturity rules require proper rollover, redemption, disclosure, and due diligence; investor gains cannot excuse regulatory breaches or pen...
The assessee filed a return manually admitting income u/s 44AE from running lorries and agricultural income. The Tribunal held that when income is offered on a presumptive basis u/s 44AE, depreciation is deemed granted, whether claimed or not, so it cannot be disallowed. As the assessee admitted presumptive income u/s 44AE from lorries, maintaining books of accounts is not required, and this income must be accepted. No adverse findings were made regarding agricultural income of Rs. 2.07 lacs, which must be accepted. The claim of past savings of Rs. 5.50 lacs cannot be rejected merely due to availing a loan and must be accepted. Considering the facts, the Tribunal directed the AO to accept business income of Rs. 1.80 lacs, agricultural income of Rs. 2.07 lacs, and restrict the addition for unexplained assets to Rs. 2 lacs.
The assessee filed a return manually admitting income u/s 44AE from running lorries and agricultural income. The Tribunal held that when income is offered on a presumptive basis u/s 44AE, depreciation is deemed granted, whether claimed or not, so it cannot be disallowed. As the assessee admitted presumptive income u/s 44AE from lorries, maintaining books of accounts is not required, and this income must be accepted. No adverse findings were made regarding agricultural income of Rs. 2.07 lacs, which must be accepted. The claim of past savings of Rs. 5.50 lacs cannot be rejected merely due to availing a loan and must be accepted. Considering the facts, the Tribunal directed the AO to accept business income of Rs. 1.80 lacs, agricultural income of Rs. 2.07 lacs, and restrict the addition for unexplained assets to Rs. 2 lacs.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.