Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
Customs relief for Strait of Hormuz maritime disruptions remains available, with existing conditions continuing unchanged through the extended validit...
Page of 4782
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
21 to 40 of 95633 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The assessee filed a return manually admitting income u/s 44AE from running lorries and agricultural income. The Tribunal held that when income is offered on a presumptive basis u/s 44AE, depreciation is deemed granted, whether claimed or not, so it cannot be disallowed. As the assessee admitted presumptive income u/s 44AE from lorries, maintaining books of accounts is not required, and this income must be accepted. No adverse findings were made regarding agricultural income of Rs. 2.07 lacs, which must be accepted. The claim of past savings of Rs. 5.50 lacs cannot be rejected merely due to availing a loan and must be accepted. Considering the facts, the Tribunal directed the AO to accept business income of Rs. 1.80 lacs, agricultural income of Rs. 2.07 lacs, and restrict the addition for unexplained assets to Rs. 2 lacs.
The assessee filed a return manually admitting income u/s 44AE from running lorries and agricultural income. The Tribunal held that when income is offered on a presumptive basis u/s 44AE, depreciation is deemed granted, whether claimed or not, so it cannot be disallowed. As the assessee admitted presumptive income u/s 44AE from lorries, maintaining books of accounts is not required, and this income must be accepted. No adverse findings were made regarding agricultural income of Rs. 2.07 lacs, which must be accepted. The claim of past savings of Rs. 5.50 lacs cannot be rejected merely due to availing a loan and must be accepted. Considering the facts, the Tribunal directed the AO to accept business income of Rs. 1.80 lacs, agricultural income of Rs. 2.07 lacs, and restrict the addition for unexplained assets to Rs. 2 lacs.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.