Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
The HC held that the respondent-authorities breached the interim order by disposing of the 3 gold bars confiscated from the petitioner in November 2022. Instead of demanding an explanation, the HC directed the respondent-authorities to pay the prevailing market price of the goods sold in violation of the order if the petitioner succeeds in appeal or revision. The petition was disposed of.
The HC held that the respondent-authorities breached the interim order by disposing of the 3 gold bars confiscated from the petitioner in November 2022. Instead of demanding an explanation, the HC directed the respondent-authorities to pay the prevailing market price of the goods sold in violation of the order if the petitioner succeeds in appeal or revision. The petition was disposed of.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.