Admissibility of electronic evidence bars undervaluation demands where printouts, retracted statements and no cross-examination leave the case unprove...
Limitation in oppression and mismanagement proceedings: prior knowledge of removal and dilution barred the challenge, with valuation directions upheld...
The HC held that the respondent-authorities breached the interim order by disposing of the 3 gold bars confiscated from the petitioner in November 2022. Instead of demanding an explanation, the HC directed the respondent-authorities to pay the prevailing market price of the goods sold in violation of the order if the petitioner succeeds in appeal or revision. The petition was disposed of.
The HC held that the respondent-authorities breached the interim order by disposing of the 3 gold bars confiscated from the petitioner in November 2022. Instead of demanding an explanation, the HC directed the respondent-authorities to pay the prevailing market price of the goods sold in violation of the order if the petitioner succeeds in appeal or revision. The petition was disposed of.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4817 
Join Channel 
