Retrospective cancellation of charitable registration under section 12AB(4) was unsustainable; related-party benefit allegations did not prove nongenu...
Merger control notice and disclosure rules: Supreme Court limits penalties, rejects reopening of approved combination, and sets aside adverse findings...
The HC held that the respondent-authorities breached the interim order by disposing of the 3 gold bars confiscated from the petitioner in November 2022. Instead of demanding an explanation, the HC directed the respondent-authorities to pay the prevailing market price of the goods sold in violation of the order if the petitioner succeeds in appeal or revision. The petition was disposed of.
The HC held that the respondent-authorities breached the interim order by disposing of the 3 gold bars confiscated from the petitioner in November 2022. Instead of demanding an explanation, the HC directed the respondent-authorities to pay the prevailing market price of the goods sold in violation of the order if the petitioner succeeds in appeal or revision. The petition was disposed of.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4813 
Join Channel 
