International transaction benchmarking restricts transfer pricing adjustments to associated-enterprise dealings, while functional comparability govern...
Joint development agreements defer taxable transfer where possession lacks part performance, while completed flats determine consideration and exempti...
Passenger baggage re-export requires true declaration and cannot be granted indirectly through discretionary redemption of undeclared prohibited goods...
Appellants challenged enhancement of values of imported 'Induction Cookers' by respondent without following best assessment method or providing admissible evidence. CESTAT held there was no justification to compare goods imported by different importers as specifications and features vary. No admissible evidence was provided to reject transaction value declared by appellants. Respondent discarded declared value without basis. Paying duty under compulsion cannot be considered acceptance of loaded value. In absence of justifiable reason, enhancement of declared value is untenable. Appeal allowed.
Appellants challenged enhancement of values of imported 'Induction Cookers' by respondent without following best assessment method or providing admissible evidence. CESTAT held there was no justification to compare goods imported by different importers as specifications and features vary. No admissible evidence was provided to reject transaction value declared by appellants. Respondent discarded declared value without basis. Paying duty under compulsion cannot be considered acceptance of loaded value. In absence of justifiable reason, enhancement of declared value is untenable. Appeal allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4782
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
