Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
Writ petition partly allowed. Order of provisional attachment of petitioner's immovable properties purchased prior to 2014 u/s 5(1) of PML Act set aside as without jurisdiction. Properties acquired before commission of alleged offence cannot be attached as proceeds of crime under PML Act. Though statutory remedies exist against provisional attachment orders, writ petition maintainable if order wholly without jurisdiction. HC observed provisional attachment order cannot be challenged before any authority, but Adjudicating Authority can examine legality only from date of its order, not provisional order date. Hence, if provisional attachment without jurisdiction, writ remedy available.
Writ petition partly allowed. Order of provisional attachment of petitioner's immovable properties purchased prior to 2014 u/s 5(1) of PML Act set aside as without jurisdiction. Properties acquired before commission of alleged offence cannot be attached as proceeds of crime under PML Act. Though statutory remedies exist against provisional attachment orders, writ petition maintainable if order wholly without jurisdiction. HC observed provisional attachment order cannot be challenged before any authority, but Adjudicating Authority can examine legality only from date of its order, not provisional order date. Hence, if provisional attachment without jurisdiction, writ remedy available.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.