Bona fide disclosure requirements govern under-reporting penalties, and post-penalty immunity applications cannot secure available statutory protectio...
Certificate-of-origin verification procedure governs preferential customs benefits; denial without retroactive verification was set aside with consequ...
Disciplinary Committee jurisdiction and mandatory investigation requirements invalidated cancellation of an insolvency professional's registration and...
Retention of seized property survives where recorded reasons support proceeds of crime, while stayed investigation periods are excluded from limitatio...
A notice for reopening assessment for AY 2014-15 could not be issued beyond the period of six years. Uploading of information by the investigation wing would not substitute recording satisfaction note by AO and handing over material for initiation of proceedings u/s 153C. No reference of asset representing escaped income, hence reopening for ten years u/s 153A not applicable. Notice issued beyond six years from end of AY 2014-15, beyond limitation period. HC allowed petition, set aside impugned notices u/s 148A(b) and 148, decided in favour of assessee.
A notice for reopening assessment for AY 2014-15 could not be issued beyond the period of six years. Uploading of information by the investigation wing would not substitute recording satisfaction note by AO and handing over material for initiation of proceedings u/s 153C. No reference of asset representing escaped income, hence reopening for ten years u/s 153A not applicable. Notice issued beyond six years from end of AY 2014-15, beyond limitation period. HC allowed petition, set aside impugned notices u/s 148A(b) and 148, decided in favour of assessee.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.