Faceless reassessment jurisdiction turned on retrospective AO definition, with later faceless-assessment changes treated as clarificatory and procedur...
Page of 4805
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
2121 to 2140 of 96100 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
A notice for reopening assessment for AY 2014-15 could not be issued beyond the period of six years. Uploading of information by the investigation wing would not substitute recording satisfaction note by AO and handing over material for initiation of proceedings u/s 153C. No reference of asset representing escaped income, hence reopening for ten years u/s 153A not applicable. Notice issued beyond six years from end of AY 2014-15, beyond limitation period. HC allowed petition, set aside impugned notices u/s 148A(b) and 148, decided in favour of assessee.
A notice for reopening assessment for AY 2014-15 could not be issued beyond the period of six years. Uploading of information by the investigation wing would not substitute recording satisfaction note by AO and handing over material for initiation of proceedings u/s 153C. No reference of asset representing escaped income, hence reopening for ten years u/s 153A not applicable. Notice issued beyond six years from end of AY 2014-15, beyond limitation period. HC allowed petition, set aside impugned notices u/s 148A(b) and 148, decided in favour of assessee.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
