Development agreements require legal possession or effective enjoyment for capital gains transfer; permissive possession and deferred consideration de...
Prolonged sterilisation of development rights supports capital-gains treatment, while business-income disallowances cannot govern capital-gains comput...
Additional evidence in transfer pricing dispute leads to fresh examination, while tax deductions, TDS credit, fee and refund interest require verifica...
Category II AIF pass-through taxation preserves non-business income character; investment receipts cannot be reclassified without applying recognised ...
CIT(A) lacked power to change provision under which addition was made in assessment order. Addition was made u/s 69A for cash receipts from society members. ITAT set aside CIT(A)'s treatment of addition u/s 69A, holding CIT(A) could only confirm, reduce, enhance or annul assessment u/s 251(1)(a), but not change provision for item assessed.
CIT(A) lacked power to change provision under which addition was made in assessment order. Addition was made u/s 69A for cash receipts from society members. ITAT set aside CIT(A)'s treatment of addition u/s 69A, holding CIT(A) could only confirm, reduce, enhance or annul assessment u/s 251(1)(a), but not change provision for item assessed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.