Patent-settlement expenditure treated as commercially expedient revenue outlay, with foreign-law restrictions inapplicable before the prospective amen...
International transaction benchmarking restricts transfer pricing adjustments to associated-enterprise dealings, while functional comparability govern...
Joint development agreements defer taxable transfer where possession lacks part performance, while completed flats determine consideration and exempti...
CIT(A) lacked power to change provision under which addition was made in assessment order. Addition was made u/s 69A for cash receipts from society members. ITAT set aside CIT(A)'s treatment of addition u/s 69A, holding CIT(A) could only confirm, reduce, enhance or annul assessment u/s 251(1)(a), but not change provision for item assessed.
CIT(A) lacked power to change provision under which addition was made in assessment order. Addition was made u/s 69A for cash receipts from society members. ITAT set aside CIT(A)'s treatment of addition u/s 69A, holding CIT(A) could only confirm, reduce, enhance or annul assessment u/s 251(1)(a), but not change provision for item assessed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.