Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Risk-based postal import clearance standardises electronic assessment, document requests, duty realisation and delivery controls at Foreign Post Offic...
Customs Cargo Service Provider appointment extends custodianship to additional terminal land, subject to cargo-control, security and licence condition...
CIT(A) lacked power to change provision under which addition was made in assessment order. Addition was made u/s 69A for cash receipts from society members. ITAT set aside CIT(A)'s treatment of addition u/s 69A, holding CIT(A) could only confirm, reduce, enhance or annul assessment u/s 251(1)(a), but not change provision for item assessed.
CIT(A) lacked power to change provision under which addition was made in assessment order. Addition was made u/s 69A for cash receipts from society members. ITAT set aside CIT(A)'s treatment of addition u/s 69A, holding CIT(A) could only confirm, reduce, enhance or annul assessment u/s 251(1)(a), but not change provision for item assessed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.