Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Page of 4803
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
381 to 400 of 96046 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
CIT(A) lacked power to change provision under which addition was made in assessment order. Addition was made u/s 69A for cash receipts from society members. ITAT set aside CIT(A)'s treatment of addition u/s 69A, holding CIT(A) could only confirm, reduce, enhance or annul assessment u/s 251(1)(a), but not change provision for item assessed.
CIT(A) lacked power to change provision under which addition was made in assessment order. Addition was made u/s 69A for cash receipts from society members. ITAT set aside CIT(A)'s treatment of addition u/s 69A, holding CIT(A) could only confirm, reduce, enhance or annul assessment u/s 251(1)(a), but not change provision for item assessed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.