Patent-settlement expenditure treated as commercially expedient revenue outlay, with foreign-law restrictions inapplicable before the prospective amen...
International transaction benchmarking restricts transfer pricing adjustments to associated-enterprise dealings, while functional comparability govern...
Page of 4786
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 95715 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The HC allowed the writ petition challenging the dismissal of an appeal under Article 226 of the Constitution as time-barred. It held that statutory limitation provisions should be interpreted liberally where genuine hardships are demonstrated, particularly considering judicial precedents favoring such relief. Despite the appeal being filed beyond the prescribed 30 days from the communication of the adjudication order, extendable by another 30 days at the Appellate Authority's discretion, the HC found the petitioner's case meritorious due to procedural irregularities and arbitrary actions. Consequently, it quashed the appellate order dated 30.08.2024.
The HC allowed the writ petition challenging the dismissal of an appeal under Article 226 of the Constitution as time-barred. It held that statutory limitation provisions should be interpreted liberally where genuine hardships are demonstrated, particularly considering judicial precedents favoring such relief. Despite the appeal being filed beyond the prescribed 30 days from the communication of the adjudication order, extendable by another 30 days at the Appellate Authority's discretion, the HC found the petitioner's case meritorious due to procedural irregularities and arbitrary actions. Consequently, it quashed the appellate order dated 30.08.2024.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4786
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
