Admissibility of electronic evidence bars undervaluation demands where printouts, retracted statements and no cross-examination leave the case unprove...
Limitation in oppression and mismanagement proceedings: prior knowledge of removal and dilution barred the challenge, with valuation directions upheld...
Insolvency professional agency governance rules amended to add nominee directors, tighten independent director eligibility, and regulate managing dire...
The HC allowed the writ petition challenging the dismissal of an appeal under Article 226 of the Constitution as time-barred. It held that statutory limitation provisions should be interpreted liberally where genuine hardships are demonstrated, particularly considering judicial precedents favoring such relief. Despite the appeal being filed beyond the prescribed 30 days from the communication of the adjudication order, extendable by another 30 days at the Appellate Authority's discretion, the HC found the petitioner's case meritorious due to procedural irregularities and arbitrary actions. Consequently, it quashed the appellate order dated 30.08.2024.
The HC allowed the writ petition challenging the dismissal of an appeal under Article 226 of the Constitution as time-barred. It held that statutory limitation provisions should be interpreted liberally where genuine hardships are demonstrated, particularly considering judicial precedents favoring such relief. Despite the appeal being filed beyond the prescribed 30 days from the communication of the adjudication order, extendable by another 30 days at the Appellate Authority's discretion, the HC found the petitioner's case meritorious due to procedural irregularities and arbitrary actions. Consequently, it quashed the appellate order dated 30.08.2024.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4814 
Join Channel 
