Tax exemption for regulatory authority income applies retrospectively, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and return filing...
Dispute Resolution Panel objections must reach both prescribed forums; otherwise assessment may proceed and statutory appeal remains the proper remedy...
Political contribution deductions require recipient party compliance with contribution-reporting conditions; banking-channel donations alone do not qu...
Aggregation under TNMM prevents selective testing of intra-group services without comparable uncontrolled transactions, while appellate additional cla...
Protective assessment cannot duplicate identical receipts under competing characterisations; remote services did not establish a taxable permanent est...
Page of 4792
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
461 to 480 of 95833 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Sensitive information gathered by Intelligence Department forming basis of search operation need not be disclosed to petitioners. Withholding such information does not violate principles of natural justice. Source of information collected by Intelligence Department crucial for maintaining confidentiality and integrity of investigative processes. SC in T. TAKANO case emphasized safeguarding sensitive information obtained during investigations to protect third-party rights, market stability and investor interests. Principles of natural justice do not entail right to indiscriminate disclosures where sensitive third-party interests involved. Investigative authority to balance noticee's right to disclosure with imperative to protect third-party rights and market stability. HC concludes withholding of sensitive information justified, does not breach natural justice as relied upon documents provided to petitioner. Petition disposed of.
Sensitive information gathered by Intelligence Department forming basis of search operation need not be disclosed to petitioners. Withholding such information does not violate principles of natural justice. Source of information collected by Intelligence Department crucial for maintaining confidentiality and integrity of investigative processes. SC in T. TAKANO case emphasized safeguarding sensitive information obtained during investigations to protect third-party rights, market stability and investor interests. Principles of natural justice do not entail right to indiscriminate disclosures where sensitive third-party interests involved. Investigative authority to balance noticee's right to disclosure with imperative to protect third-party rights and market stability. HC concludes withholding of sensitive information justified, does not breach natural justice as relied upon documents provided to petitioner. Petition disposed of.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4792
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
