Opportunity to respond to jurisdictional reports is mandatory before customs settlement duty enhancement; connected applications require consistent ad...
Specific customs headings for scaffolding components prevail over general classification, invalidating misclassification proceedings and enabling with...
Liquidator appointment under Section 34 requires consideration of creditor recommendations, valid professional authorisation, and preservation of vali...
The HC quashed the order passed u/s 73 of the CGST Act by the Assistant Commissioner due to lack of reasoning, non-application of mind, and violation of principles of natural justice. The Assistant Commissioner adopted an identical template, merely stating that the reply filed was "not comprehensible, conceivable, not perspicuous and is ambiguous" without any substantive reasoning, despite previous cautions against using such a template. The HC held that this exhibited an abject non-application of mind and failure to make amends despite earlier directions.
The HC quashed the order passed u/s 73 of the CGST Act by the Assistant Commissioner due to lack of reasoning, non-application of mind, and violation of principles of natural justice. The Assistant Commissioner adopted an identical template, merely stating that the reply filed was "not comprehensible, conceivable, not perspicuous and is ambiguous" without any substantive reasoning, despite previous cautions against using such a template. The HC held that this exhibited an abject non-application of mind and failure to make amends despite earlier directions.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4792
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
