Transfer pricing comparables and adjustments: Tribunal revisits loss-maker status, segmental comparability, working capital relief, and risk allocatio...
Business expenditure disallowance failed where commission, related-party salary and promotion payments were supported by records and inquiry was inade...
The assessee was entitled to deduction u/s 10A despite receiving foreign exchange beyond six months from the end of the previous year, as the Reserve Bank of India, being the competent authority under the Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999, had granted approval for realization of export proceeds by the assessee. The HC held that such approval met the requirement of Section 10A(3), entitling the assessee to exemption u/s 10A. The decision was rendered in favor of the assessee, in line with the Bombay HC judgment in Morgan Stanley Advantage Services P. Ltd.
The assessee was entitled to deduction u/s 10A despite receiving foreign exchange beyond six months from the end of the previous year, as the Reserve Bank of India, being the competent authority under the Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999, had granted approval for realization of export proceeds by the assessee. The HC held that such approval met the requirement of Section 10A(3), entitling the assessee to exemption u/s 10A. The decision was rendered in favor of the assessee, in line with the Bombay HC judgment in Morgan Stanley Advantage Services P. Ltd.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4824 
Join Channel 
