Admissibility of electronic evidence bars undervaluation demands where printouts, retracted statements and no cross-examination leave the case unprove...
Limitation in oppression and mismanagement proceedings: prior knowledge of removal and dilution barred the challenge, with valuation directions upheld...
The assessee was entitled to deduction u/s 10A despite receiving foreign exchange beyond six months from the end of the previous year, as the Reserve Bank of India, being the competent authority under the Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999, had granted approval for realization of export proceeds by the assessee. The HC held that such approval met the requirement of Section 10A(3), entitling the assessee to exemption u/s 10A. The decision was rendered in favor of the assessee, in line with the Bombay HC judgment in Morgan Stanley Advantage Services P. Ltd.
The assessee was entitled to deduction u/s 10A despite receiving foreign exchange beyond six months from the end of the previous year, as the Reserve Bank of India, being the competent authority under the Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999, had granted approval for realization of export proceeds by the assessee. The HC held that such approval met the requirement of Section 10A(3), entitling the assessee to exemption u/s 10A. The decision was rendered in favor of the assessee, in line with the Bombay HC judgment in Morgan Stanley Advantage Services P. Ltd.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4817 
Join Channel 
