Retrospective cancellation of charitable registration under section 12AB(4) was unsustainable; related-party benefit allegations did not prove nongenu...
Merger control notice and disclosure rules: Supreme Court limits penalties, rejects reopening of approved combination, and sets aside adverse findings...
The assessee was entitled to deduction u/s 10A despite receiving foreign exchange beyond six months from the end of the previous year, as the Reserve Bank of India, being the competent authority under the Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999, had granted approval for realization of export proceeds by the assessee. The HC held that such approval met the requirement of Section 10A(3), entitling the assessee to exemption u/s 10A. The decision was rendered in favor of the assessee, in line with the Bombay HC judgment in Morgan Stanley Advantage Services P. Ltd.
The assessee was entitled to deduction u/s 10A despite receiving foreign exchange beyond six months from the end of the previous year, as the Reserve Bank of India, being the competent authority under the Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999, had granted approval for realization of export proceeds by the assessee. The HC held that such approval met the requirement of Section 10A(3), entitling the assessee to exemption u/s 10A. The decision was rendered in favor of the assessee, in line with the Bombay HC judgment in Morgan Stanley Advantage Services P. Ltd.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4813 
Join Channel 
