Arrest safeguards and transit remand requirements invalidated detention following inter-State transfer without communicated grounds or magistrate auth...
Arrest safeguards require disclosed grounds, relative intimation and transit remand, while duplicate prosecution under the CGST framework is unsustain...
Document Identification Number defects can invalidate GST assessments, with delayed challenges entertained conditionally where patent irregularities e...
Windmill commissioning evidence supported higher depreciation where grid connection and electricity generation proved operational use before the relev...
Pharmaceutical promotion and transfer-pricing comparability principles limited disallowances, while uncorroborated search allegations and unsupported ...
The NCLAT dismissed the company petition filed by the appellant on grounds of lack of maintainability and delay. It held that the appellant failed to establish his membership in the respondent company between 2012-2013 till the filing of the petition in 2023. The appellant was removed as a member in the EOGM dated 01.02.2012, which was published in the newspaper, and he did not challenge this decision. With 97 members on the date of filing, the appellant did not meet the statutory threshold for filing the petition u/s 244(b) of the Companies Act, 2013. The NCLAT rejected the appellant's argument of believing he was still a member during these years, finding no infirmity in the impugned order. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed as devoid of merit.
The NCLAT dismissed the company petition filed by the appellant on grounds of lack of maintainability and delay. It held that the appellant failed to establish his membership in the respondent company between 2012-2013 till the filing of the petition in 2023. The appellant was removed as a member in the EOGM dated 01.02.2012, which was published in the newspaper, and he did not challenge this decision. With 97 members on the date of filing, the appellant did not meet the statutory threshold for filing the petition u/s 244(b) of the Companies Act, 2013. The NCLAT rejected the appellant's argument of believing he was still a member during these years, finding no infirmity in the impugned order. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed as devoid of merit.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4796
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
