Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
The NCLAT dismissed the appeal, holding that the Resolution Professional had jurisdiction to file an application for withdrawal of CIRP u/s 12A of the IBC. The NCLAT relied on the Supreme Court's judgment in GLAS Trust Company LLC, which held that after admission of CIRP, the proceedings become in rem, and the Resolution Professional must conduct them. The NCLAT found no error in the Adjudicating Authority's order permitting withdrawal of the Section 12A application after the claim of a creditor was admitted, necessitating reconstitution of the CoC. The appeal against the earlier order became infructuous due to the subsequent order.
The NCLAT dismissed the appeal, holding that the Resolution Professional had jurisdiction to file an application for withdrawal of CIRP u/s 12A of the IBC. The NCLAT relied on the Supreme Court's judgment in GLAS Trust Company LLC, which held that after admission of CIRP, the proceedings become in rem, and the Resolution Professional must conduct them. The NCLAT found no error in the Adjudicating Authority's order permitting withdrawal of the Section 12A application after the claim of a creditor was admitted, necessitating reconstitution of the CoC. The appeal against the earlier order became infructuous due to the subsequent order.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4786
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
