Faceless reassessment jurisdiction turned on retrospective AO definition, with later faceless-assessment changes treated as clarificatory and procedur...
Page of 4807
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
2161 to 2180 of 96140 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The NCLAT dismissed the appeal, holding that the Resolution Professional had jurisdiction to file an application for withdrawal of CIRP u/s 12A of the IBC. The NCLAT relied on the Supreme Court's judgment in GLAS Trust Company LLC, which held that after admission of CIRP, the proceedings become in rem, and the Resolution Professional must conduct them. The NCLAT found no error in the Adjudicating Authority's order permitting withdrawal of the Section 12A application after the claim of a creditor was admitted, necessitating reconstitution of the CoC. The appeal against the earlier order became infructuous due to the subsequent order.
The NCLAT dismissed the appeal, holding that the Resolution Professional had jurisdiction to file an application for withdrawal of CIRP u/s 12A of the IBC. The NCLAT relied on the Supreme Court's judgment in GLAS Trust Company LLC, which held that after admission of CIRP, the proceedings become in rem, and the Resolution Professional must conduct them. The NCLAT found no error in the Adjudicating Authority's order permitting withdrawal of the Section 12A application after the claim of a creditor was admitted, necessitating reconstitution of the CoC. The appeal against the earlier order became infructuous due to the subsequent order.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.