Specialized Investment Fund distribution now requires dedicated certification, while transitional recognition preserves existing qualified distributor...
Overlapping GST proceedings require Central and State authorities to designate one competent authority for coordinated adjudication of the same matter...
Composite healthcare supplies retain exemption when patient care is the contract's essential character, despite payment through an implementing agency...
Receipt of immovable property requires actual possession or enjoyment; redevelopment allotments exchanged for tenancy rights fall outside deemed incom...
The NCLAT held that the date of default for invoking proceedings u/s 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (I&B Code) should be reckoned from 01.10.2012, when notices u/s 13(2) of SARFAESI Act were issued to the Corporate Debtor. The One-Time Settlement (OTS)/Compromise decree of 03.01.2020 cannot be considered the date of default, as default occurred when notices were issued and accepted by the Corporate Debtor in 2012. Since the application u/s 7 was filed on 19.07.2020, after the limitation period from the date of default in 2012, the NCLAT dismissed the appeal, holding the proceedings barred by limitation.
The NCLAT held that the date of default for invoking proceedings u/s 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (I&B Code) should be reckoned from 01.10.2012, when notices u/s 13(2) of SARFAESI Act were issued to the Corporate Debtor. The One-Time Settlement (OTS)/Compromise decree of 03.01.2020 cannot be considered the date of default, as default occurred when notices were issued and accepted by the Corporate Debtor in 2012. Since the application u/s 7 was filed on 19.07.2020, after the limitation period from the date of default in 2012, the NCLAT dismissed the appeal, holding the proceedings barred by limitation.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4798
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
