Patent-settlement expenditure treated as commercially expedient revenue outlay, with foreign-law restrictions inapplicable before the prospective amen...
International transaction benchmarking restricts transfer pricing adjustments to associated-enterprise dealings, while functional comparability govern...
Page of 4786
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 95715 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The HC set aside the impugned order dated 9 March 2009 passed by the Special Director (Enforcement) due to inordinate and unexplained delay between the conclusion of arguments and pronouncement of the order. The matter was remanded to the Special Director (Enforcement) to dispose of the show cause notices issued against the appellants expeditiously after providing them a hearing and passing reasoned orders within a reasonable period, preferably within three months from the conclusion of the hearing as per the guidelines laid down in Ramdular Singh vs. State of UP. The appellants were directed to appear before the Special Director on 2 January 2025 to set a schedule for the hearing.
The HC set aside the impugned order dated 9 March 2009 passed by the Special Director (Enforcement) due to inordinate and unexplained delay between the conclusion of arguments and pronouncement of the order. The matter was remanded to the Special Director (Enforcement) to dispose of the show cause notices issued against the appellants expeditiously after providing them a hearing and passing reasoned orders within a reasonable period, preferably within three months from the conclusion of the hearing as per the guidelines laid down in Ramdular Singh vs. State of UP. The appellants were directed to appear before the Special Director on 2 January 2025 to set a schedule for the hearing.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4786
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
