Tax exemption for regulatory authority income applies retrospectively, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and return filing...
Dispute Resolution Panel objections must reach both prescribed forums; otherwise assessment may proceed and statutory appeal remains the proper remedy...
Political contribution deductions require recipient party compliance with contribution-reporting conditions; banking-channel donations alone do not qu...
Aggregation under TNMM prevents selective testing of intra-group services without comparable uncontrolled transactions, while appellate additional cla...
Protective assessment cannot duplicate identical receipts under competing characterisations; remote services did not establish a taxable permanent est...
Page of 4792
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
461 to 480 of 95833 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The CESTAT allowed the appeal by way of remand to the Adjudicating Authority. The appellant raised new grounds in the miscellaneous application which were not considered by the authorities below. To uphold principles of natural justice, the matter was remanded to the Adjudicating Authority to consider the additional grounds raised by the appellant afresh on merits. The appellant had previously accepted the service tax liability by depositing the confirmed demand amount based on a Delhi High Court judgment. However, the CESTAT opined that the department should have an opportunity to contest the new grounds raised by the appellant which are purely legal issues.
The CESTAT allowed the appeal by way of remand to the Adjudicating Authority. The appellant raised new grounds in the miscellaneous application which were not considered by the authorities below. To uphold principles of natural justice, the matter was remanded to the Adjudicating Authority to consider the additional grounds raised by the appellant afresh on merits. The appellant had previously accepted the service tax liability by depositing the confirmed demand amount based on a Delhi High Court judgment. However, the CESTAT opined that the department should have an opportunity to contest the new grounds raised by the appellant which are purely legal issues.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4792
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
