Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
The CESTAT allowed the appeal by way of remand to the Adjudicating Authority. The appellant raised new grounds in the miscellaneous application which were not considered by the authorities below. To uphold principles of natural justice, the matter was remanded to the Adjudicating Authority to consider the additional grounds raised by the appellant afresh on merits. The appellant had previously accepted the service tax liability by depositing the confirmed demand amount based on a Delhi High Court judgment. However, the CESTAT opined that the department should have an opportunity to contest the new grounds raised by the appellant which are purely legal issues.
The CESTAT allowed the appeal by way of remand to the Adjudicating Authority. The appellant raised new grounds in the miscellaneous application which were not considered by the authorities below. To uphold principles of natural justice, the matter was remanded to the Adjudicating Authority to consider the additional grounds raised by the appellant afresh on merits. The appellant had previously accepted the service tax liability by depositing the confirmed demand amount based on a Delhi High Court judgment. However, the CESTAT opined that the department should have an opportunity to contest the new grounds raised by the appellant which are purely legal issues.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4782
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
