Business expenditure deduction requires proof of genuine commission payments and commercial allowability; turnover growth alone cannot validate the cl...
Article 8 treaty coverage excluded third-party airline support services, while documented demonetisation cash receipts remained accepted business inco...
The CESTAT held that the movement of goods from the appellant's manufacturing unit in Rajasthan to its depots in Bihar and Jharkhand constituted inter-state stock transfers, not inter-state supply of goods. Consequently, no central sales tax was leviable. The demand was set aside and the appeal was allowed, considering the Liquor Sourcing Policy of Bihar, Liquor Policy of Jharkhand, and identical Master Agreements between the appellant and Corporations in those states.
The CESTAT held that the movement of goods from the appellant's manufacturing unit in Rajasthan to its depots in Bihar and Jharkhand constituted inter-state stock transfers, not inter-state supply of goods. Consequently, no central sales tax was leviable. The demand was set aside and the appeal was allowed, considering the Liquor Sourcing Policy of Bihar, Liquor Policy of Jharkhand, and identical Master Agreements between the appellant and Corporations in those states.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4782
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
