Arrest safeguards require disclosed grounds, relative intimation and transit remand, while duplicate prosecution under the CGST framework is unsustain...
Document Identification Number defects can invalidate GST assessments, with delayed challenges entertained conditionally where patent irregularities e...
Windmill commissioning evidence supported higher depreciation where grid connection and electricity generation proved operational use before the relev...
Pharmaceutical promotion and transfer-pricing comparability principles limited disallowances, while uncorroborated search allegations and unsupported ...
Business expenditure substantiation supports scrap credits, statutory payments and expense claims, while depreciation requires proof of actual busines...
The CESTAT held that the movement of goods from the appellant's manufacturing unit in Rajasthan to its depots in Bihar and Jharkhand constituted inter-state stock transfers, not inter-state supply of goods. Consequently, no central sales tax was leviable. The demand was set aside and the appeal was allowed, considering the Liquor Sourcing Policy of Bihar, Liquor Policy of Jharkhand, and identical Master Agreements between the appellant and Corporations in those states.
The CESTAT held that the movement of goods from the appellant's manufacturing unit in Rajasthan to its depots in Bihar and Jharkhand constituted inter-state stock transfers, not inter-state supply of goods. Consequently, no central sales tax was leviable. The demand was set aside and the appeal was allowed, considering the Liquor Sourcing Policy of Bihar, Liquor Policy of Jharkhand, and identical Master Agreements between the appellant and Corporations in those states.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4788
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
