Claim filing format under insolvency inspection rules requires identity details, loss explanation, computation, and notarised verification above the t...
The HC quashed the summoning order and allowed the petition. It held that after the commencement of CIRP proceedings against the accused company and appointment of IRP under IBC, the control and management vested with IRP. The dishonoured cheques were post moratorium, and the petitioners cannot be held vicariously liable u/s 138 of NI Act. Proceedings u/s 138 cannot continue against the corporate debtor once moratorium u/s 14 of IBC is in effect.
The HC quashed the summoning order and allowed the petition. It held that after the commencement of CIRP proceedings against the accused company and appointment of IRP under IBC, the control and management vested with IRP. The dishonoured cheques were post moratorium, and the petitioners cannot be held vicariously liable u/s 138 of NI Act. Proceedings u/s 138 cannot continue against the corporate debtor once moratorium u/s 14 of IBC is in effect.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4809 
Join Channel 
