Faceless reassessment jurisdiction turned on retrospective AO definition, with later faceless-assessment changes treated as clarificatory and procedur...
Page of 4807
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
2161 to 2180 of 96140 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The HC quashed the summoning order and allowed the petition. It held that after the commencement of CIRP proceedings against the accused company and appointment of IRP under IBC, the control and management vested with IRP. The dishonoured cheques were post moratorium, and the petitioners cannot be held vicariously liable u/s 138 of NI Act. Proceedings u/s 138 cannot continue against the corporate debtor once moratorium u/s 14 of IBC is in effect.
The HC quashed the summoning order and allowed the petition. It held that after the commencement of CIRP proceedings against the accused company and appointment of IRP under IBC, the control and management vested with IRP. The dishonoured cheques were post moratorium, and the petitioners cannot be held vicariously liable u/s 138 of NI Act. Proceedings u/s 138 cannot continue against the corporate debtor once moratorium u/s 14 of IBC is in effect.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4807 
Join Channel 
