Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Page of 4803
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
381 to 400 of 96046 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
HC set aside order imposing late fee on petitioner for delayed GSTR-9/9C filing before 01.04.2023, holding petitioner entitled to benefit of amnesty notification N/N. 07/2023 dated 31.03.2023 exempting late fee for filings between 01.04.2023-30.06.2023. HC ruled differential treatment violative of Article 14, directed withdrawal of impugned order/show cause notice, remanded for fresh order extending amnesty benefit to petitioner.
HC set aside order imposing late fee on petitioner for delayed GSTR-9/9C filing before 01.04.2023, holding petitioner entitled to benefit of amnesty notification N/N. 07/2023 dated 31.03.2023 exempting late fee for filings between 01.04.2023-30.06.2023. HC ruled differential treatment violative of Article 14, directed withdrawal of impugned order/show cause notice, remanded for fresh order extending amnesty benefit to petitioner.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4803
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
